Tue Jan 17
7:00 PM
Tufts
at Babson
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
Emerson
at Wheaton
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
WPI
at Clark
Live on Charter TV3
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
Babson
at MIT
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
Coast Guard
at Springfield
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
Wheaton
at Coast Guard
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
Smith
at Wellesley
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
Springfield
at WPI
Wed Jan 18
7:00 PM
MIT
at Emerson
Sat Jan 21
12:00 PM
Wellesley
at Wheaton
Sat Jan 21
1:00 PM
MIT
at Emerson
Sat Jan 21
1:00 PM
Babson
at Coast Guard
Sat Jan 21
1:00 PM
Smith
at Clark
Sat Jan 21
1:00 PM
Babson
at Mount Holyoke
Sat Jan 21
1:00 PM
Springfield
at MCLA
Sat Jan 21
2:00 PM
Wheaton
at WPI
Sat Jan 21
2:00 PM
Coast Guard
at MIT
Sat Jan 21
3:00 PM
Springfield
at Clark
Sat Jan 21
3:00 PM
WPI
at Emerson
Mon Jan 23
5:30 PM
Wheaton
at Roger Williams
Mon Jan 23
7:00 PM
Merchant Marine
at Coast Guard
Wed Jan 25
5:30 PM
Clark
at Babson
Wed Jan 25
5:30 PM
Emerson
at Springfield
Wed Jan 25
7:00 PM
MIT
at Wheaton
Wed Jan 25
7:00 PM
Coast Guard
at WPI
Wed Jan 25
7:00 PM
Emerson
at Coast Guard
Wed Jan 25
7:00 PM
Trinity (Conn.)
at Smith
Wed Jan 25
7:00 PM
Wellesley
at Clark
Wed Jan 25
7:30 PM
Mount Holyoke
at Springfield
Wed Jan 25
7:30 PM
MIT
at Babson
Sat Jan 28
12:00 PM
WPI
at Springfield
Sat Jan 28
12:00 PM
Fisher
at Emerson
Sat Jan 28
1:00 PM
Coast Guard
at Wheaton
Sat Jan 28
1:00 PM
Wheaton
at Mount Holyoke
Sat Jan 28
1:00 PM
Smith
at Babson
Sat Jan 28
2:00 PM
Clark
at MIT
Sat Jan 28
2:00 PM
Coast Guard
at Wellesley
Sat Jan 28
2:00 PM
MIT
at Springfield
Sat Jan 28
2:00 PM
Clark
at WPI
Sat Jan 28
3:00 PM
Emerson
at Babson
Tue Jan 31
7:00 PM
Wesleyan (Conn.)
at MIT
Wed Feb 01
5:30 PM
WPI
at Emerson
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
Clark
at Coast Guard
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
Babson
at Wheaton
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
MIT
at Springfield
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
Springfield
at Smith
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
Mount Holyoke
at WPI
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
Coast Guard
at Clark
Wed Feb 01
7:00 PM
Babson
at Wellesley
Wed Feb 01
7:30 PM
Wheaton
at Emerson
Sat Feb 04
1:00 PM
Emerson
at Clark
Sat Feb 04
1:00 PM
Coast Guard
at MIT
Sat Feb 04
1:00 PM
Springfield
at Wheaton
Sat Feb 04
1:00 PM
Emerson
at Mount Holyoke
Sat Feb 04
1:00 PM
Clark
at Babson
Sat Feb 04
2:00 PM
Babson
at WPI
Sat Feb 04
2:00 PM
WPI
at Coast Guard
Sat Feb 04
3:00 PM
Wheaton
at Springfield
Sat Feb 04
3:00 PM
Smith
at MIT
Tue Feb 07
7:00 PM
Norwich
at Mount Holyoke
Wed Feb 08
5:30 PM
Coast Guard
at Emerson
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
Springfield
at Babson
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
Wheaton
at Clark
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
MIT
at WPI
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
Wellesley
at Smith
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
WPI
at Springfield
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
Clark
at MIT
Wed Feb 08
7:00 PM
Coast Guard
at Wheaton
Wed Feb 08
7:30 PM
Babson
at Emerson
Sat Feb 11
1:00 PM
Springfield
at Emerson
Sat Feb 11
1:00 PM
Mount Holyoke
at MIT
Sat Feb 11
1:00 PM
Wellesley
at WPI
Sat Feb 11
1:00 PM
Emerson
at Clark
Sat Feb 11
1:00 PM
Springfield
at Coast Guard
Sat Feb 11
2:00 PM
Wheaton
at Smith
Sat Feb 11
3:00 PM
Wheaton
at MIT
Sat Feb 11
3:00 PM
Babson
at Clark
Sat Feb 11
3:00 PM
WPI
at Coast Guard
No Event
No Event
Previous Next View Full Schedule

A Better Way to Protect College Athletes

A Better Way to Protect College Athletes

The following article, written by Mount Holyoke College President and chair of the NEWMAC Presidents Council, Lynn Pasquerella, appeared in The Chronicle of Higher Education on July 16, 2012.

After Dale Lloyd II, a first-year student at Rice University, died following an intense football workout in 2006, it was discovered that he had sickle-cell trait, which placed him at increased risk during heavy physical activity. He is one of 21 NCAA athletes who have died unexpectedly following intense practices since 2000—10 of whom were found to have carried the trait. Lloyd's family filed suit against both Rice and the National Collegiate Athletic Association to make sure that no other students or families suffered similar tragedies.

People with sickle-cell trait have one of the two genes needed for sickle-cell anemia. Generally people with the trait have no medical problems, but the blood cells of some carriers can become sickle-shaped during extreme exercise, making it more difficult for the blood to deliver oxygen to organs and muscles.

As part of a settlement with the Lloyd family, the NCAA now requires sickle-cell testing of all Division I athletes, and beginning in August it will extend testing to Division II athletes. This response raises serious questions regarding the extent to which organizations are justified in protecting themselves against liability at the expense of individual privacy rights. These concerns are at the forefront of public discussion for those of us with Division III athletic programs, as the NCAA pushes to extend its requirements to cover our athletes, too.

The NCAA says testing for the trait will keep athletes safe by raising awareness among carriers of the trait and their coaches. Yet the fact that the organization allows an opt-out from testing if players sign a waiver protecting their colleges and universities from liability suggests that the policy's paternalism is more liability-driven than in the best interest of the athletes.

Players who fear stigmatization or discrimination may feel pressured into opting out, knowing that being treated differently on the field will automatically send a signal to teammates and scouts. Once a medical condition is revealed, there are further risks in terms of insurance, employment, and future athletic opportunities. The fact that 8 percent to 12 percent of blacks but only a very small percentage of people of other races carry the trait adds another dimension and raises the specter of a disparate impact on a group that has historically faced discrimination.

Some medical experts have said that the NCAA's policy is an experiment that will allow us to learn. However, experimenting at the possible expense of the rights of students is a lesson with too high a price. The fact that the screening now takes place without intervention or counseling places athletes at further risk of misinformation and undue psychological distress.

Instead of mandatory testing, the NCAA should consider a policy that changes the training protocol for all athletes and requires aggressive education about the warning signs of life-threatening overexertion. The advantage of such a policy, which has been adopted by the military, is that it protects not only those with sickle-cell trait but athletes who are at risk of other conditions linked to death following extreme workouts. This surely seems preferable to requiring EKG's or CAT scans to ward off future lawsuits based on undetected aneurisms or seizure disorders.

The NCAA's attempt to protect athletes is laudable, but the new policy has social and ethical consequences that may well override the benefits, especially when the benefits can be achieved using a less restrictive alternative.

Providing information to all athletes and their families about the value of testing and the signs of risk has advantages over mandatory testing. Yet whether or not the policy is changed, the NCAA's recent ruling forces us to consider how far we are willing to go as a society in response to liability-driven concerns.

Lynn Pasquerella is president of Mount Holyoke College and chair of the president's council for the New England Women's and Men's Athletic Conference.